Education
  • Pittsburgh Public Schools

    Issue Summary (Updated January 2011)
    Pittsburgh Public Schools
    The Issue:

     

    The Pittsburgh Public School system is too expensive, continues to suffer from declining enrollment despite the creation of the Pittsburgh Promise scholarship program, and academic performance is not commensurate with expenditures.   

     

    What We Know:

     

    The District's budget is $540 million for 2011, up from $497 million five years ago.  At the same time, enrollment has fallen to just over 25k from 29k in 2006, pushing the per-pupil expenditure from $16,886 to $20,843.  The spending push comes at a time when several Federal and state sources of revenue are tightening and the City of Pittsburgh faces its own set of problems, which does not paint a pretty picture for taxpayers.

     

    And this comes during the time the District, the City, and the foundation community created and pushed the Pittsburgh Promise scholarship program, which was to make the District attractive to middle-class families who care about education.  The District also exhibits the troublesome trend where its employment of non-teaching professionals, especially those involved in administration, is growing at a rapid rate.   

     

    Recommendations:

     

    What's to be done?  Surely a devotion to cost-cutting and a clear explanation of the benefits derived from the non-teaching personnel would be welcome.  But it is not to be expected.  Instead expect a trip to Harrisburg to appeal for more money for the District. 

  • Teacher Strikes

    Issue Summary (Updated January 2011)


    Teacher Strikes in Pennsylvania
    The Issue:

     

    Pennsylvania shares the undesirable dual distinction of being one of a small minority of states that permits teacher strikes and being the perennial leader in the number of teacher strikes nearly every year.   

     

    What We Know:

     

    While thirteen states across the nation permit teachers to strike (Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Wisconsin), the majority of teacher strikes since 2000 have taken place in three states: Pennsylvania (94), Ohio (28), and Illinois (29). It is plain to see that Pennsylvania, which is already in a minority since it is one of the few states where teachers can strike, is far and away the leader in actual stoppages.

     

    Prohibitory strike laws with prescribed and serious penalties, supported by court rulings, are effective in preventing strikes as demonstrated by Florida, Georgia, New York, Tennessee, and other states where no strikes occur. In Florida, employees who strike can be terminated and unions receive fines for damages up to $20,000 per strike day and face decertification. Georgia and Tennessee also reserve the right to terminate a striking teacher who will then have to wait three years before they can apply for re-employment. In New York, the Taylor Law imposes a penalty of two days lost pay for every day on strike. The union also loses its concession to check off dues for one year.

     

    Recommendations:

     

     

    Teacher strikes harm students, families, and communities. Strikes have financial as well as social consequences. Financial burdens are conveyed by increased property taxes due to inflated teacher contracts and childcare costs during the strike. Social consequences are displayed by strained relationships between teachers and the community and parents. Therefore, strikes reveal the selfish interests of unions and teachers at the public’s expense. Teachers are public employees and servants and should act accordingly. Teachers who strike should incur consequences for their actions. Two recommendations that would curtail the willingness and motivation for teachers to hit the picket line are:

     

    1) Impose a penalty that takes away two days pay and benefits for each day teachers miss regularly scheduled school time.

     

    2)  Prohibit teacher strikes and move contract disputes to a system of binding arbitration that relies on disinterested experts who can construct a settlement based on financial condition of the district, salary levels in other districts, and pay and benefit levels. 

     

     In short, teachers who are held accountable for their actions are far less likely to strike.

     

     


Help Us
Click on the link
below to donate
to the Allegheny Institute


Get Involved
Sign up to Receive our Policy Brief

* required

*



*



Newsletter by VerticalResponse
Join Us
Join today, and take full benefit of all of the
services we offer.

reg
Contact
Allegheny Institute
305 Mt. Lebanon Blvd.,
Suite 208,
Pittsburgh, PA 15234.
Phone: (412) 440-0079
Fax: (412) 440-0085
RSS / Subscribe
rss Click here to add RSS Feed to your Reader.