How deliciously ironic. The Laborers Union International announces it will run ads warning motorists about Pennsylvania's structurally deficient bridges.  And why are the bridges deficient?-according to the union not enough money is being spent on the bridges. 

Perhaps if the bridges did not cost 30 percent more to repair than bridges in a right to work state with no prevailing wage requirement, they would be in much better shape. The union should be asked this question: In order to have safe bridges in an environment with very limited funds available to do the work, would you be willing to abandon the prevailing wage requirement and allow less expensive non-union labor do the work?

The answer would be no. So, here is what the union is really is saying. We prefer unsafe bridges to giving up any of our stranglehold over the policies of Pennsylvania.  Indeed, they are really about soaking taxpayers regardless of the consequences. Looks like France from here.